[49 / 8]

Quoted By: >>10921454

Quoted By: >>10921309 >>10921467

Quoted By: >>10921309

Quoted By:

>>10921284

>>10921295

It is 19, if the triangle is projected on to a curved surface. Non-euclidean geometry for the win.

>>10921295

It is 19, if the triangle is projected on to a curved surface. Non-euclidean geometry for the win.

Quoted By:

Quoted By: >>10921331 >>10921332 >>10921336 >>10921467

not this shit again.

Its a right angled triangle, so it can't be equilateral. Use pythagoras theorem for this.

therefore, x = 26.87

Now for those of you guys hell bent on saying that x = 19 because of the congruency marks, for the love of god please ignore the congruency marks. those are NOT congruency marks solely due to the fact that that is a right-angled triangle.

Its a right angled triangle, so it can't be equilateral. Use pythagoras theorem for this.

therefore, x = 26.87

Now for those of you guys hell bent on saying that x = 19 because of the congruency marks, for the love of god please ignore the congruency marks. those are NOT congruency marks solely due to the fact that that is a right-angled triangle.

Quoted By:

Quoted By: >>10921383 >>10921386 >>10921434

Why are there so many mathematics students on /a/

WHY DOES AMERICA SHORTEN IT TO "MATH"

THAT'S RETARDED

WHY DOES AMERICA SHORTEN IT TO "MATH"

THAT'S RETARDED

Quoted By: >>10921404 >>10921435 >>10921495

Quoted By:

Quoted By:

Quoted By: >>10921458

>>10921345

HOW DARE PEOPLE USE WORDS DIFFERENTLY THAN ME

FUCK YOUR COLLOQUIALISMS AND DIALECTS, EVERYONE SHOULD SHOULD JUST TALK LIKE I DO

HOW DARE PEOPLE USE WORDS DIFFERENTLY THAN ME

FUCK YOUR COLLOQUIALISMS AND DIALECTS, EVERYONE SHOULD SHOULD JUST TALK LIKE I DO

Quoted By: >>10921574

>>10921434

HURR

The word is "mathematicS"

Note the plural

OH WAIT THE LOGICAL SHORTENING IS OBVIOUSLY MATH I AM SORRY FOR MY IDIOCY

HURR

The word is "mathematicS"

Note the plural

OH WAIT THE LOGICAL SHORTENING IS OBVIOUSLY MATH I AM SORRY FOR MY IDIOCY

Quoted By: >>10921785

Quoted By: >>10922028

>>10921383

YOU DIVIDED BY ZERO!!!!! WHAT HAVE YOU DONE!!!>????!!!!???? FUCK YOU!

YOU DIVIDED BY ZERO!!!!! WHAT HAVE YOU DONE!!!>????!!!!???? FUCK YOU!

Quoted By:

>>10921458

So what? It's a colloquialism, if you wanted to be fucking proper you'd just say "mathematics". It's not treated as a plural noun, anyway.

So what? It's a colloquialism, if you wanted to be fucking proper you'd just say "mathematics". It's not treated as a plural noun, anyway.

Quoted By:

Assuming that they are meant to be straight lines, thus making it a triangle, you wouldn't have 3 equal sides with a right angle.

If the lines aren't straight. You could have 3 equal sides and a right angle. But because there is no radian degree giving for the curved line, you would be assuming they are a curved line.

Or to solve this we could rely on probability of past experiences. But because we know from philosophy that our past experiences can sometimes be deceiving we can't trust them.

So we would need to know one of the following to solve this.

1. What the coordinates are for the points that the lines endpoints are.

2. The radius, range of radian of the angles and center points of the three arcs.

3.What philosophy we can use so we can apply the the correct probability from past experiences, which would lead us to believe that IT IS A FUCKING TRIANGLE.

If the lines aren't straight. You could have 3 equal sides and a right angle. But because there is no radian degree giving for the curved line, you would be assuming they are a curved line.

Or to solve this we could rely on probability of past experiences. But because we know from philosophy that our past experiences can sometimes be deceiving we can't trust them.

So we would need to know one of the following to solve this.

1. What the coordinates are for the points that the lines endpoints are.

2. The radius, range of radian of the angles and center points of the three arcs.

3.What philosophy we can use so we can apply the the correct probability from past experiences, which would lead us to believe that IT IS A FUCKING TRIANGLE.

Quoted By:

>>10921785

rectangles are boring.

I mean you see them everyday and what do they do for you?

hexagons are where it's at.

rectangles are boring.

I mean you see them everyday and what do they do for you?

hexagons are where it's at.

Quoted By: >>10921913

It's a simple Pythagorean theorem problem. The hatch marks were unfortunately used to associate a side with the lengths right next to it. Yes, he did it wrong. Get the fuck over it.