My point wasn't that Nagasumi isn't GAR. My point was that >>9343298
gave an accurate description of HOW Nagasumi saved San thus contradicting himself.
Think about it, saying that something has happened does not necessarily explain how that something was done, but if you are explaining how you did something, you need to make clear what that something was.
I'd say that the original statement >GAR is what you do, not how you do it.
should be fixed into >GAR is not what you do, but how you do it.
Saying that I climbed a mountain isn't GAR, but if I instead say that I climbed a mountain only using my left hand and carrying a bear on my back (a bear trying to kill me, at that) that would undoubtly be, if not GAR, at least more awesome than the former.