>>13131585>By your logic, if a straight heterosexual man was attracted to a 13 year old female with a hot 21 year old body, he is in the wrong. If the man was attracted to a 21 year old with a 13 year old body, he is also in the wrong. Can't have it both ways.
That's not the logic I was using at all. That's the logic I was against. The point is that breasts or not she still looks like a little girl, not a 21 year old or anywhere near. A girl can start growing breasts as early as 8 or 9 years old, but she's still a little girl.
And technically you can have it both ways like that anyway. If the 13 year old looked 21 then you could overlook a physical attraction, but the law wouldn't give a shit about that. The other way around, if the 21 year old looked 13, there's technically nothing legally wrong with that but if that's the sort of girl you're physically attracted to then you still have some sort of issue.
But anyway, I'm not trying to be a moralfag. I have nothing against loli, I couldn't care less if you're a paedophile, you can fap over her all you want. I'm just pointing out that such excuses, narrow definitions and ridiculous logic are bullshit.