i think the third paragraph is more of a twisted and unfocused blanket statement pertaining to society and sub-cultures in response to the OP question. let's cut the crap already, though, it's a little messed up to want to sexually use a 2D figure. people jacking off to a grain pattern in wood that they find erotic, no matter how unlike a human (or anything) it appears, is messed up. but, then again, psychological disorders (psychosis and neurosis) all come down to relativity, which is the ultimate justification for loliconary. it's only fucked up to people who don't find it normal. for instance, you don't like mustard. i could think you're fucked up, who doesnt like mustard? relativity, the entire argument is null since nobody is willing to give up a preference.