what is "normal" ? i find that word itself outside the realm of normality, in just the way its often used. What's "normal" for one, may not be "normal" for another. so who is right? The problem here is that normality isn't really something that can be measured over the course of time and space, and really serves no purpose than to confine us with in the morals of "this normality" To one person, they may think a "normal picture" of this gym leader may be of a REAL girl. now, that is normal to them, but your definition is off it would seem. On the other end of the spectrum, what if she was naked? maybe that's normal to someone else, because lets face it there's no other way i want to see these gym leaders anyways, but i think that's off from your main point as well. So next time you want to come to these forums and post something as vague as "more normal version of this" please think a little harder before pressing that "submit" button and give us a little more detail, background about what kind of "normal" you are wanting.